Be authorized

Beijing News Editorial: rear of Shanghai subway accident punishment is too light Beijing News Editorials "9・27" rear accidents causing more than 200 people were injured and in serious cases, making Shanghai the public production, substantial damage, so those responsible persons suspected of "serious accident crime", is certainly worth asking. Shanghai Metro "9・27" accident investigation division, the survey results were announced on October 6 and 12 responsible be dealt with。 Among them, Shen Tong, President and Chairman of the group, having a disciplined. Relevant dispatchers, watcher respectively retain look at one year and out of positions, administrative removal, such as having a, demerit punishment sth However, results did not show any "transferred to judicial organs", "criminal" Word, even the "discharged from public employment" is not. Therefore believed thatRelatively light punishment, not enough to take warning from the past in order to be more careful in the future. "Transgression" is the principle of punishment. The Criminal Code provides for a "serious accident crime"--in breach of the relevant provisions of security management in the production, job diablo 3 gold, event of a major accident or other serious consequences, constitute a crime. On the crimes, required by the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the so-called heavy casualties, refers to the death caused by one or more,Or serious injury caused by three or more persons; the so-called serious consequences are caused direct economic losses of more than 50,000 yuan, as well as economic losses despite insufficient provisions, but the circumstances are serious, production, substantial damage. The point is that the party is in violation of safety regulations, that requirement is not observed. If it is because there is no specific safety procedures, are of a technical, Management BoardNorm defect, from the system it is never too late. Seen from published results, recognized by accident investigation team directly because the dispatcher fault section location of all trains without precise positioning of cases, illegal publication telephone block command; the station duty officer in the case of not strictly recognized range line is idle for, violations agreed the station telephone blocking requirements. It is clear that theseNot be plucked, but does not follow. So follow-up treatment should be strictly. "9・27" rear accidents causing more than 200 people were injured, and the circumstances are serious, significant damage to production, working, as related personnel are arrested for "criminal major accident", is certainly worth asking. Still needs to be clarified is that identified by the investigation team, is not recognized by the windCase of dangerous, take targeted measures, Shen Tong group maintenance center work sheet of the company issued no blackout job, resulting in power loss when the construction, and lead to automatic monitoring and control system failure. Where is the problem? Technical miscalculation, accident, or the abuse? If violations of code of practice for hasty construction, or to know that there are security risks and lack of measures taken,Responsibility is more than just Chief demerit, and is suspected of "production safety accident crime". Construction of if circuits are involved, no Shanghai Metro "risk identification" "precautions" management regulations, the problem is more serious. Similarly, the dispatcher could not determine if any train case, "illegal" order, what should be the normal procedure? What is verifying diablo 3 power leveling, Be authorized, to place an order? What error correction mechanism? This system, is sufficient to put an end to rear? Why this "violation"? …… These are the public most want to know, the survey results could not be accurately and dispel doubts. Accident investigation is intended to restore truth, clarify reason to prevent tragedies, and give the public a clear explanation of responsible: Metro is secure? This accidentsWhether has eliminated all known technical flaws and lack of management? This is of greatest concern to the public. This, must establish strict accountability of foundations.